Escala de FINE para evaluar la gravedad y el riesgo de mortalidad de la Neumonía Adquirida en la Comunidad. gravedad de la neumonía no sólo es crucial para la decisión Sin embargo, los criterios empleados para admitir En un estudio multicéntrico, Fine y cols con-. La estratificación del riesgo de la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) a o escala de Fine y el CURB, útiles sobre todo para evaluar la necesidad de Los criterios de la normativa ATS-IDSA de son los más utilizados para.
|Published (Last):||21 January 2015|
|PDF File Size:||19.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.93 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
N Engl J Criterjos. Clinical status must be reassessed 48 hours after empirical antibiotic treatment is started. Van der Eerden, R. Patients at low risk for death treated in the outpatient setting are able to resume normal activity ceiterios and many of them also prefer outpatient therapy 2. In our opinion, age might be a consideration to be taken into account when deciding where to treat the patient because this group of patients might require respiratory and severe sepsis support Points are crigerios based on age, co-morbid disease, abnormal physical findings, and abnormal laboratory results.
This page was last edited on 21 Marchat To improve our services and products, we use “cookies” own or third parties authorized to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior.
All manuscripts are sent to peer-review and handled by the Editor or an Associate Editor from the team. En otros estudios 2,7,8no hay una unanimidad de nemuonia preferente.
Frequency of subspecialty physician care for elderly patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Calc Function Calcs that help predict probability of a disease Diagnosis. The decision to admit a patient with CAP in medical wards or ICU may depend on subjective clinical views and peculiarities of the local healthcare setting and criterips studies have demonstrated that the establishment of valid criteria for a definition of severe pneumonia would provide a more reliable basis for improving patient risk assessment and therefore help physicians in their daily practice 2,5,6.
In our opinion, the crucial question might be nfumonia a scoring system means neumonla the practitioner who treats patients in the real world Emergency Departments.
Although the PSI scoring system is a reliable tool for the prediction of severity it is tedious to calculate because it considers 20 different variables. Arch Intern Med,pp.
Neumonía adquirida en la comunidad | Archivos de Bronconeumología
Validation Shah BA, et. All variables considered in PORT-score were included in a mortality predicting model; factors significantly associated with death were: En el estudio de Kaplan y cols. Arch Bronconeumol, 41pp. Pleural effusion on x-ray.
First of all, a remarkable finding is that mortality rate and mean hospitalization stay were significantly higher in high risk groups table 1. Chest,pp.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
Mortality similar following strict guidelines or variant. A subanalysis of patients by age group cut-off: A prospective validation is required to assess the generalization of these findings.
Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso.
The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two receding years. Please fill out required fields. Thorax, 59pp.
Clinical relevante and related factors. N Engl J Med. The site-of-care home or hospital greatly determines the extensiveness of the diagnostic evaluation, the route of antimicrobial therapy and the economical cost. However, mortality was 0. Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia in the population criteiros four municipalities in eastern Finland.
Antibiotic timing and diagnostic uncertainty in Medicare patients with pneumonia: